Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWCarea51

I thought that acquittql on grounds of self defense made civil suit for damages not available. Anyone else read this?


238 posted on 07/10/2013 6:31:46 AM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: cajungirl

I haven’t read it but it IMHO would make it more difficult.


242 posted on 07/10/2013 6:32:49 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

To: cajungirl

Even if that is the case, you can be sure Eric Witholder will ignore it.


245 posted on 07/10/2013 6:33:31 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

To: cajungirl

Yes that’s what I understand as well.


247 posted on 07/10/2013 6:34:20 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

To: cajungirl

I thought that acquittql on grounds of self defense made civil suit for damages not available. Anyone else read this?


Yes. I did. It was explained that it is specifically a Florida thing.


257 posted on 07/10/2013 6:36:20 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

To: cajungirl

http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/776.032

http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/776.012


309 posted on 07/10/2013 6:49:31 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson