Not if the jury follows the law. Mere suppostion to suggest it’s possible TM could have been backing away from the fight. There is not a shred of evidence that was the case. It’s just making stuff up. In the absence of such evidence, reasonable doubt always goes to the defendant. It isn’t up to the defendant to prove that TM wasn’t backing up. It’s up the state to prove he was. Of course they can’t do that. They have nothing but fairy tales.
Thank you...I pray you are right and the jury is not trying to find something.... anything...to hang him on.