The liberal slant was the degree of raving based on one media article without waiting for sufficient evidence as if it is an open and shut case. Personally, I can wait a little for reasonable evidence and do not demand that the emotion and the MSM be the arbiters here.
A dead dog is reasonable evidence that a crime was committed against the family.
This is not a case of “he said/ he said”. The difference of opinion lies only in the attempts of the government employee to justify his actions:
“It’s ok. I’m a cop.”
“It attacked me.”
“It attacked my wife.”
“It attacked me, my wife, and my dog”.
Think logically.
What person, after shooting an animal justifiably would believe his or her occupation germane to relate to the owners of said animal?