I watched the interviews with the jurors on television after that trial.
The ones who appeared on camera were the most decrepit low information cretins I had ever heard outside of the OJ jury.
They were obsessed with Jackson's celebrity, and refused to hear the evidence (by their own admission). Now the news is telling us one of the men who testified that Jackson was "innocent" admits he was paid off, and that Jackson repeatedly raped him.
Of course, nobody but Michael himself ever would lie, of course. And the women who complained about Herman Cain getting too fresh with them were all on the level too.
Until an investigation is actually done, all we have is rumor.
“Advocates of the late pop star are already trading messages accusing Robson of opportunism, suggesting the plaintiff is seeking a piece of Jackson’s booming estate, which has seen sales of his music spike since his death in June 2009.”
Michael Jackson isn’t here to be interviewed any more, and sadly, lies and scandals abound in the entertainment set. Anything’s possible. Maybe some of the kids had their own twisted minds and asked Michael to do something weird and he consented. Maybe Michael suggested it to them. Maybe neither one.
As one has said...you don’t need a court’s decision to put two and two together. ...some things are just obvious.