Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: going hot
Not from a movie (WWI):


18 posted on 06/14/2013 8:19:03 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard
More from WWI:


20 posted on 06/14/2013 8:20:06 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard

Low ready does kind of suck after you fix bayonets.


29 posted on 06/14/2013 8:29:54 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard
Mostly taught to carry at port arms, because that was what was in the manual. However, as wars became more closely fought, and the enemy was closer and closer, rifles were carried more at the ready. Even in wwI or wwII, if in the bush, and enemy close, rifles were carried pointed forward at the ready. In the nam, parachord was used to tie to the front sight and the stock thus enabling the rifle to hang at the ready off the shoulder.

The movies of earlier soldiers portrayed the carrying the rifle at port arms because that is what the soldiers did if not engaged in close combat. however, the movies would often show them at port arms even in close combat, wheras, in reality, the rifle would be held more ready to engage in actual combat, because the GI was actually there, scared Shiite less, and ready to pull the trigger at any sign of movement in the bush.

30 posted on 06/14/2013 8:30:11 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson