firefighters went in saw the room that the child was in and discovered that the child was deadAgain -- since it appears you missed it the first time -- Who went in to check to determine the child was dead before the father was tased -and- if they were right there with the child, why did they *leave* the child? Or, is this hind-sight reporting? That is, *IF* they actually went in and checked for signs of life at all? What did they look from binoculars? Just poke their head in the front door? Or did they lay hands on the child and check for breath & pulse? And if they did, why did they leave the child behind, dead or alive?
Yep. Nice piece of work by these so called, "heroes"...
A more reasonable and prudent read indicates this is just a hind-sight story to cover their backsides. Fortunately for them, the evidence was burned to a crisp and the coroner already has their narrative. The only thing anyone knows without a doubt is: "That's their story and they're sticking to it".
“Again — since it appears you missed it the first time — Who went in to check to determine the child was dead before the father was tased”
One of the firefighters.
“if they were right there with the child, why did they *leave* the child?”
The child was dead by the time they got to him.
“That is, *IF* they actually went in and checked for signs”
You assert that they did not go in. Where’s your evidence for this? I have evidence to support me. You do not.
“Yep. Nice piece of work by these so called, “heroes”
I suggest you tell them in person what you just told me.
“A more reasonable and prudent read indicates this is just a hind-sight story to cover their backsides.”
Do you have any evidence to support your allegation?