“for all we know, there may have only been smoke showing.”
The facts that we do have state that the child was dead before the father attempted to go in to save the child.
Does that change the calculus or are you going to be like everyone else here and doubt direct evidence provided by witnesses at the scene because it proves that you are wrong?
The facts that we do have state that the child was dead before the father attempted to go in to save the child.Who went in to check to determine the child was dead before the father was tased and why didn't they remove the child at the time? Or, is this hind-sight reporting?
The point being, it is tragic and no-one knew for sure if the child could be saved in the heat of the moment. The father was willing to risk it. It was his decision.
The cowards stopped him because *they* couldn't muster the nerve to go in and check, so they were damned determined to keep anyone else from trying.
The point still stands. Care to take another feeble swipe at it or are you ready to *quit*?