Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JeanLM
Doesn’t have to be homosexual contact. Hetero-oral is the same risk.

Correct. And it is rampant with no symptoms. A PAP will pick it up in women (and it's said on your next PAP it can be gone) and in men it's undetectable.

31 posted on 06/03/2013 2:40:54 PM PDT by Lizavetta (You get what you tolerate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Lizavetta

A PAP test looks for dysplastic (disorganized) cells as well as cancerous, the dysplasia being a possible fore-runner to cancer. If the immune system clears out the virus, the cells can return to a normal state. Non-viral infection can also cause the dysplasia - which is why a gynecologist should test thoroughly for other infection before doing a cone biopsy of the cervix, which in turn can lead to incompetent cervix and pregnancy loss.

All that said, a PAP test for the throat certainly should be possible - both the throat and the cervix being covered with squamous epithelium.

And Douglas is supposed to have had a walnut-sized lump in his tongue - how do miss that? His poor wife, she’s going to have to be swabbed above and below for a while.

Final speculation: would oral HPV infections and cancers acquired from men tend to occur further back in the mouth and throat than those acquired from women?


36 posted on 06/03/2013 2:54:29 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Lizavetta

Not exactly. In men, the visible sign is warts and skin tags. Usually in a private area.


77 posted on 06/03/2013 7:15:17 PM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson