Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chode

If the obese and the smokers have to pay higher medical premiums under ObamaCare because of their “risky behavior,” surely homosexuals should as well. To do otherwise is overt discrimination because the expense to keep them alive is staggering.


4 posted on 06/02/2013 2:02:44 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: txrefugee
100%
7 posted on 06/02/2013 2:08:29 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: txrefugee
If the obese and the smokers have to pay higher medical premiums under ObamaCare because of their “risky behavior,” surely homosexuals should as well. To do otherwise is overt discrimination because the expense to keep them alive is staggering.

Of course, one of the primary reasons liberals want government subsidized and controlled health-care is because it creates a rationalization for government to control, incentivize and financially punish the behavior of private citizens. Regardless of the specific behavior being encouraged or punished, the end-result is more government control of the way individuals live their lives.
11 posted on 06/02/2013 2:13:38 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: txrefugee

“If the obese and the smokers have to pay higher medical premiums under ObamaCare because of their “risky behavior,” surely homosexuals should as well.”

Homosexuals will probably get free medical care. The little faggots ought to be paying every nickel they earn to insurance as they wanted “gay marriage” simply to get employer spousal medical benefits. It was during the early 1980s the little fags started contracting and dying of AIDS they decided to demand spousal medical insurance.

Homosexuality is a choice; a lifestyle they practice. It is not a genetic disorder as proven by identical twins where one choses homosexuality but the other does not.

Their sexual perversions know no bounds.


38 posted on 06/02/2013 2:54:36 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: txrefugee
If the obese and the smokers have to pay higher medical premiums under ObamaCare because of their “risky behavior,” surely homosexuals should as well.

Furthermore, if the nanny gummint can ban high-capacity sodas and tobacco, why can't they at least discourage homosexuality, if not ban it outright?

Oh, that's right. We're only a "collective" when it moves the agenda to the left.

43 posted on 06/02/2013 3:09:08 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: txrefugee
If the obese and the smokers have to pay higher medical premiums under ObamaCare because of their “risky behavior...

In Kali exchanges they don't.

70 posted on 06/02/2013 5:37:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Plan "B" is now Plan "A")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: txrefugee
19 percent of gay and bisexual men in 21 major U.S. cities are infected with HIV, and 44 percent of them do not know it, according to a CDC Press Release, reporting results from the 2008 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System. 59 percent of black men, 46 percent of Hispanic men and 26 percent of white men were unaware of their infection. Among 18 to 29-year-old men, 63 percent did not know they were infected with HIV, compared with 37 percent of men aged 30 and older. http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/ngmHAAD2010PressRelease.html
92 posted on 06/03/2013 6:03:27 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson