I can assure you I'm telling the truth about what I really think. As to whether a criminal homicide actually occurred, only the cops at the scene and the witnesses can truly know. I can't lie about what I saw, since I wasn't a witness.
On the OJ case, I think he's as guilty as sin. But that's just my view. The common thread through my opinions on both of these cases is my inclination to believe the testimony of law enforcement. The difficulty with witness testimony in rough neighborhoods is that many individuals living there are not only of dubious character, they are friends or relatives of the kinds of the criminals who live there. They don't only not snitch on the local criminals - they also actively stand up for them. And for area civilians that might speak up for the police in such cases, doing so is viewed as equivalent to snitching, meaning that they are painting a "beat or kill me" sign on their backs.
It is undisputed that the cops confiscated the phones without a warrant.
Why would they do that if the cops had nothing to hide?
Isn’t it obvious?