“If you are playing dumb, that is a jerkish thing to do. If you are genuinely this clueless...that is just freakishly scary.”
—Really? Let’s see who’s being clueless... try to answer one simple question (and speaking of ‘playing dumb’ and being ‘jerkish,’ you have yet to even try answering any questions.) When you said:
“Wrong. It was a veterinarian who first identified the blood cells.”
What was it that I was wrong about?
I refer you to post 119, where I took time I cd ill afford & laid out the entire timeline of the exchange. You responded:
“I already said I misunderstood - when you mentioned the vet I thought you were referring to Gayle. I’m not disagreeing with you”
Now today you are saying just the opposite of what you said yesterday. Are you a dual personality? Does the person posting today have no idea what the person (posting under your screenname) said yesterday?
You really need to harmonize your stories. Were you right yesterday when you cdn’t fault my meticulously accurate timeline, or are you right today when you’re contradicting what you said yesterday?
[I’m not delineating post 119 a second time. I shouldn’t have had to go to that much trouble once. Twice is out of the question.]
To All: I apologize for ever getting involved w this poster. He’s the tar baby of contradictory, time-wasting contentless posts. This is a great thread. Post 94 is one of the best I’ve ever read on FR; thank you varmintman. Had I known responding to the poster in question wd result in the thread getting bogged down w what is either purposeful misdirection or cluelessness on a scary scale I’d have ignored him completely. Again, my apologies. It won’t happen again.