I agree with Debka’s reliability. It has gone from poor to terrible.
That being said, I still like to consider all perspectives and look for the facts for and against any prospective theory. One of the best ways to gather the facts is to post the article here on FR. You will have a few who just discount it based upon being from Debka, but most will challenge the facts they present. That is what I like.
It was interesting to look at the posting accounts of the naysayers. Knowing that these postings are monitored by outsiders, you can easily profile posters by reviewing their history of postings. Most members are excellent independent critical thinkers. Some I question if they are just disrupters, whose purpose is to create confusion of facts. We must all sort them out for ourselves.
The basic outline makes perfect sense to me. It’s pure le Carre.