If he's a Pr*ck, then you're a double or triple-Pr*ck, as it's abundantly clear that I wasn't attempting to hide anything earlier. I had even earlier posted a quote virtually identical to the one you falsely called me a LIAR over.
You are STILL attempting to hide the fact that Bingham IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE!
How about you just admit it? Here is some suggested words.
"Bingham is not on my side."
Here's a variation. "Bingham agrees with you, not me. "
"Bingham has stabbed my theory in the back." Also works.
Face it Jeff, Losing Bingham is a Mortal blow to your argument, and you just can't stand it. You tried to finesse his words into supporting your argument, but you couldn't do it without cutting off his clarification. And you were caught attempting to do it!