[Conscience of a Conservative]

“Both subjects are considered armed and dangerous and according to authorities”

Probably just a CCW holder or purchased a gun once. Maybe the grandmother said he touched a gun once in his life.

Or, maybe they are considered "armed and dangerous" because they "have attempted a previous abduction at gun point in Louisiana."

[newzjunkey]

Or, maybe they are considered "armed and dangerous" because they "have attempted a previous abduction at gun point in Louisiana."

I'm amazed at freepers saying they'd be first to aid and abet these parents and whining about the phrase "antigovernment" while completely ignoring the previous abduction attempt.

[George from New England]

Something very fishy. How would they have been accused of abduction in another state. If either state had custody it wouldn’t span to another state. Interstate activity is non-existant.