Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
They would come up with some counter argument, and whether it makes sense or not, it will satisfy them that their position is correct.

Before or after they launch into their "YOU'RE A HATEFUL BIGOT AND A HOMOPHOBE" tirade?

8 posted on 03/27/2013 12:59:35 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA

They already have the right to ‘incorporate’ under the laws of their state.

As for marriage, that’s a religious tenant, not a legal one. The state got lazy because never in a million billion years did anyone ever think that ‘sane’ people would be arguing this question.

Courts should readily see this, but the wattage of SCOTUS has been historically pretty low.

Cohabitational incorporation is what it ought to be called. What goes on in a church is sacramental, and as such, defined by the tenants of that religion.

Lutherans and episcopalians are trying to make that point moot, but I don’t think they’ll succeed.

North Korea is at their highest state of military readiness, Cyprus is having a run on their banks (with Italy to follow), Syria and Egypt are near collapse, and Iran’s about 5 minutes away from having an A-bomb.

But we are talking about this. The mendacity of liberals is boundless.


31 posted on 03/27/2013 1:17:07 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson