[TheOldLady]

"I don't think any Pit should be put down except for the ones with human blood in their mouths, but let's make sure they can't breed, okay? Oh, look what just happened yesterday...:

"http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2300315/Toddler-mauled-7-dogs-Tragedy-year-old-Georgia-girl-killed-pit-bulls.html"

Because one child was left to the dogs by her parents, you blame the dogs and want to wipe out the breed? No.

You are not making sense. You say that only biting pits should be put down, but then you say you want to exterminate the breed, whether the dogs are deadly or not.

Confused much?

Your broad brush leftist tactic will be your undoing here. You just went from a pretty okay guy to an idiot for sucking down that leftist Kool-aid, IMO.

The behavior of dogs is determined by their upbringing and handling. The owners of vicious dogs are the ones whom we should stop from breeding. </sarc>

It is not the dogs' fault. You have this one very wrong.

[Eaker]

Clearly TOL has pegged you correctly.

It is liberals like you that are "slippery slope" proponents. If you were successful in banning pit bulls you would go after the rotties then dobies next. If your type had your way the only acceptable dog would be a muzzled poodle.

You are no different than the New Yorkers who were cheerleaders for Bloomberg's anti-smoking campaign but are squealing like stuck pigs because you can no longer buy a Big Gulp soda.

You want to control what others do but want nobody to control you.

In these parts fellers like you are considered hypocrites and are anything but conservative.

Here is wee Salamander with her puppy. You would be on the band wagon to ban this breed too.

[Salamander]

“Because one child was left to the dogs by her parents”

Frankly, I think I turned out better for having been ‘raised by wolves’.

:)