Replies

Read the law and perhaps you will understand why I call what you’re reading conspiracy crap.

What wrong with conspiracy’s?... There are so many it hard to count them all..

A good one is the VENONA FILES.. man that is a good one...

Then there is Vince Foster!... Sandy Berger(burgular)!.. JFK assination!.. Whittaker Chambers! and HIss!... Ted Kennedy murder!... and all the other people murdered on the Clintoon death list.. and of course Bengazi and “Fast and Furious”...

The whole FDR presidency was and is conspiracy.. and no doubt HArry Trumans as well.. don’t get me started on Wilson!... <<- NO not the soccer ball the President..

Talking about Washington D.C. it is hard to find a time were there was NOT multiple conspiracy’s going on.. not to speak of most States.. and even local givernments..

The entire democrat party was and is a conspiracy against this republic.. NOT just local intrigues but OUTRIGHT conspiracy’s..

WHat do you put “IN” your Kool-Aid?...

A good conspiracy needs an element of truth, that's not easily debunked.

For example the Clinton legacy of mysterious deaths, at least sports a long list of deaths associated with the Clintons who died under suspicious circumstances with potentially valid motives.

This Fed stuff doesn't qualify. Too many facts are availble for checking and debunking.

Just like the claim that was made that "there's nothing Federal about the Federal Reserve", and I was instantly able to name many things about it's control structure and profit structure that are entirely Federal in nature.

Most of these Fed conspiracy theories make wild claims about who really owns and controls the FED. But the stockholders of the Federal Reserve banks are listed. And the control structure is unlike any other business. Each bank no matter how small in a Federal Reserve district gets one vote, no matter how much capital they have. No matter how much stock they bought. You'd have control a thousand banks in each district to have any influence.

And you can see the major stockholders of the various banks. It's in their public filings. And it's not the Rothchilds, and it's not Europeans.

It's just easily debunkable crap.

Then you start looking at the job the Fed did. And you compare it to what happened under the Gold standard when we had deflationary depressions every 20 years and the value of the dollar swung wildly, sometimes as much as 25% in some years. And you start appreciating the year to year stability to the dollar that the FED brings.

Then you look at the progress America has made over time under the Fed. And it's good.