Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TalonDJ

Interesting article. Of course it’s possible that both McNair and Patton opposed a heavier tank. McNair cites a prevaailing veiw among combat commanders that a heavy tank was not needed, and there was no role for tank on tank combat. Patton certainly could have been one of those commanders.


36 posted on 03/19/2013 2:00:40 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin
Patton certainly could have been one of those commanders.

That seems likely. He did favor speed and mobility in his tactics and strategies. He did not have the clout McNair had though. I would be willing to bet that most commanders on the ground, given a choice between a Sherman with a better gun, and a slower tank, would have taken the gun. The OP article is the best run down I have seen on why they did not realize they needed a better gun.
59 posted on 03/21/2013 5:54:30 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson