Replies

I should have made the comment as follows:
All the good reporting on the erroneous so called scientific sanctioned
science on what we call AGW in general, with such articles as this
miss the point that the over all raw data that enters into various models used
by various sources is BAD, MODIFIED to meet an agenda.
In short. Garbage in. Garbage out.
Hansen along with his clown buddies in Europe simply modify
so called ground station data, other, and feed SHIT into their models.
SHIT IN. SHIT OUT. It's all just a sick game. Around and around in circles.
But I do fully appreciate to a high degree, the many sources,
that do their homework and bring out with more stable if I can use
that word, in effect, honest statistics, as well as growing
data feed by sat systems etc..
A more solid view as to how one can even attempt to classify a phenomena such as "global warming" or for that matter
"global cooling", as some intrinsic ate value one can use to somehow
measure what is really happening world wide. I'll leave it go at that.

All the good reporting on the erroneous so called scientific sanctioned science on what we call AGW in general, with such articles as this miss the point that the over all raw data that enters into various models used by various sources is BAD, MODIFIED to meet an agenda. In short. Garbage in. Garbage out.

True enough. There have been numerous articles on just that. In fact, that's where I first heard of Anthony Watts. He was challenging the temperatures reported by weather stations where the local environment had changed (eg, paving or nearby structures added) which caused the reported temperature to increase.

I am no expert on global warming, but I do try to make sure that my friends and acquaintances are made aware of such developments, as well as the ClimateGate revelations. The MSM isn't going to tell the public about information which would cause doubt that global warming was occurring or that it was man made. So, we have to bypass the MSM, making them more and more irrelevant.

If the public remains ignorant, it will be because people like us, who have read the information, have failed to point our friends to the places on the internet where they can read it themselves.