Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TXnMA

1995 was not the only time this test was given, and not only to U.S. Marines. Over time the basic outcome of the test was as follows.

1) Officers would generally refuse to fire on U.S. citizens
2) Of the NCO ranks, only hardcore NCOs bent on seeking promotion would fire on U.S. Citizens. A smaller percentage of NCOs, as opposed to Officers, but still a larger percentage than the hardcore NCOs, would refuse to fire on U.S. civilians.
3) The enlisted ranks, almost to a man, would refuse to fire on enlisted ranks.

The results were consistant from year to year. It Seems the thought process contained a strong element of “We are not going to fire on mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, cousins, and good ‘ol uncle Buck.

The procurement of huge amounts of ammunition, way more than would be needed for any conceivable training programme, now makes sense if you wanted to use the TSA, BTAFE, IRS, FBI, etc., etc., as the core of Obama’s private Army.

Lord, how the lower instinct part of me just wishes he would try this. I bet there is a very large percentage of the 60,000,000 arms bearing Americans who have similar feelings. We could settle the “Contitutional” issues once and for all.


39 posted on 01/24/2013 6:26:15 AM PST by .44 Special (Taimid Buarch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: .44 Special

3) The enlisted ranks, almost to a man, would refuse to fire on enlisted ranks

Should read:

3) The enlisted ranks, almost to a man, would refuse to fire on U.S. civilians


41 posted on 01/24/2013 6:31:07 AM PST by .44 Special (Taimid Buarch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson