So it is less believable that CNN used stock footage of a school shooting in the minutes after the violence, than CNN being involved in a breathtaking conspiracy to make Americans falsely believe that 26 children were murdered?
No, but it is believable that CNN could have received the video from an outside source
If the media and the government don’t wish to be thought of as liars, then perhaps they should stop lying.
Tell me, why should I believe any of them or anything that they say when the only thing that I have ever seen actual proof of is their lies?
Did it happen? Maybe.
Have I seen any acutal proof that it happened? No.
At the link provided: “It is St. Rose of Lima School, a private school a few miles away, also in Newtown.”
How did CNN get footage at one school where there was not a shooting mixed into this report only about Sandy Hook? That’s all: just a question.
What is wrong with this CNN chart? (Obama's economy) (Cnn Money ^ | 1/22/13 )
So it is less believable that CNN used stock footage of a school shooting in the minutes after the violence, than CNN being involved in a breathtaking conspiracy to make Americans falsely believe that 26 children were murdered?
It is most beliveable that the so called journaists over at CNN are lazy arsehats who in an effort to appear sensational use stock footage of live events to try to bolster their declining ratings....
No, it’s more believeable.