Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
Reynolds vs the US is the case you are looking for.

Wow, I'll give you kudos for knowing that case, however you don't know WTF you're talking about.

The SCOTUS decided a State issue, it was not Federal law, as you posted it should be.

Next,,,,

128 posted on 01/20/2013 6:49:30 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron

“Wow, I’ll give you kudos for knowing that case, however you don’t know WTF you’re talking about.”

Reynolds states explicitly that the federal government has jurisdiction to preserve the definition of marriage as one man and one woman.

“The SCOTUS decided a State issue”

Well, then. I’ve provided a citation that shows otherwise. Show me the legal case that verifies your opinion.


132 posted on 01/20/2013 6:56:27 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson