Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

I know Mars is extremely dry, yet given the frequent planet wide dust storms thereon, I’d expect considerably more erosion and burial from between 1.8 and 3.5 billion years.


4 posted on 01/19/2013 9:00:14 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: onedoug; null and void
I’d expect considerably more erosion and burial from between 1.8 and 3.5 billion years.

Right. The surrounding terrain is pocked with craters. I see none in the riverbed.

5 posted on 01/19/2013 9:18:43 AM PST by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: onedoug
Yup, you would almost expect to see the same texture of the surrounded landscape at the bottom of the river after a billion years or so due to fill, especially since it's very deep.
Kind of a natural trap for dust.
11 posted on 01/19/2013 9:31:08 PM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson