They have dismissed other similar cases without conference.
Which chaos would the justices rather have?
One driven by rule of law that shows fraud on the part of a powerful and popular leader - coupled with inner city rioting.
Or
One driven by the federal branch acting outside its authority that has tens of thousands of armed citizens striking back at the illegal actions of a federal government, that is likely to fight back.
In my view, one chaos is contained and self-inflicted, likely to have limited duration and be controllable.
The other is very open ended.
It looks like the choice could very well be in the hands of the USSC. I know which way I would pick. (Assuming they are aware of the coming Obama EO on guns.)
Good points Triple.
In either case, I’m continuing to “stock up.”
Good points Triple.
In either case, I’m continuing to “stock up.”