Obama uses a different local law firm in each state ballot challenge. He is not represented by Perkins and Cole. Local lawyers know state eligibility requirements and state election law better than a national firm would.
You might remember that Alexandra Hill (Genova, Burn & Giantomasi) represented him against Mario Apuzzo in New Jersey and that the infamous Michael Jablonski (private practice attorney) represented Obama in Georgia against Orly Taitz in the “trial on the merits” of Farrar, Powell, Swennson and Welden v Obama. A local Atlanta attorney, Jablonsky refused to show up for the trial and was threatened with a default judgement against his client which the plaintiffs rejected.
Neither Hill nor Jablonsky work for Perkins-Cole nor do Tepper (Garfied & Tepper) and Begley (Begley Law Firm).
These other examples are irrelevant as the motions that were filed in Mississippi and the request for the letter of verification from Hawaii were specifically filed on behalf of the MDEC alone and not Obama. The point I brought up still stand. If this firm has a direct connection with Obama, then they could or should have been submitting one of the TWO alleged hard copies of the LFBC instead of a printout of a PDF and a vague letter of verification that shouldn’t be necessary upon the submission of a legitimate LFBC.