MFLR.
He must be mighty lonely at Harvard since he is teaching the truth.
My dad worked with a guy who adopted an “open marriage” back in the 70’s, Then he became very disillusioned when his wife ran off with her tennis instructor.
Perhaps they really SHOULD have been tennis partners.
He’s from Harvard??? Thank you God! There is hope after all.
“George said that the definition of marriage has slowly eroded in recent decades, citing the rise of no-fault divorce as a reason it has transformed into a mere form of companionship.”
Bingo! To campaign against same-sex marriage without addressing the underlying erosion of marriage via the divorce laws is an exercise in futility.
“Not two people who are just tennis partners or met in college to form a political union.” - bmwcyle
The idea of the sacrifice in the relationship to raise a family vs the idea of the pretend marriage of same sex-ual partners with no sacrifice but claiming the respect due is hitting the nail on the head. "Expressive individualism" is a great way to put it.
I was beginning to think they did not alow the wise in universitys anymore.
“Tennis Partners” ... Sodomy redefined as serve and volley.
‘Well, what do you think marriage is?’
The state’s answer in the modern era is always going to be ‘whatever judges, pols, or 51% of the voting public think it is at any one time.’ First divorce, then no fault divorce and remarriage, now gay marriage in some states, in 50 years no doubt something even more insane. It was always a danger, except now many have been conditioned to think that the state actually defines and creates marriage, so they are will to accept whatever impossibility the state decides to call marriage at the time.
Freegards