“There was no copy provided as an exhibit.”
Sorry, my mistake, I thought this was the packet sent to Kansas in the objection.
“Objection to the Certificate of Nomination of Barack Obama to appear on Kansas General Election Ballot - filed by Joe Montgomery, Manhattan”
Appendix E is the MDEC verification.
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/432798/obama-kansas.pdf
And in the transcript Attorney General Schmidt said, “I’ve reviewed all the material you submitted and listened carefully to your testimony.”
Kobach said he had something in his packet that was “given to a court in Mississippi by the State of Hawaii.” Appendix E doesn’t list the court as a recipient. Appendix E was an exhibit to show that the verification was missing language pertinent to the Federal Rules of Evidence, which explains why it was not legally compelling. Again, the lack of compelling evidence is why Kobach felt compelled to get his own letter of verification from Hawaii and it’s why he talked about contacting Mississippi and Arizone for CERTIFIED evidence. What part of that is unclear??