Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

That was the time of the first quotation of a divine affirmative statement in scripture about it; however the concept of animal sacrifices was much older (it was the point of friction between Cain and Abel), and the use of skins was obviously deemed okay. It would be surprising if in such a situation people yet remained vegetarians.

I’d want to know how the whiz kids deduced this. Humans and humanoid animals have traditionally been omnivores.


10 posted on 12/24/2012 7:13:09 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

The use of skins was deemed okay because God Himself first made coverings for Adam and Eve out of an animal skin.

However the sacrifices were burnt offerings and they were consumed by the fire. Nowhere in the sacrifice rituals did anyone ever eat the animal after it was made a burnt offering to God.

Permission was given only after the flood, after the entire earth’s ecosystme had drastically changed. And at this time God put fear of man into animals because of this change, so that they wouldn’t be hunted to extinction.


14 posted on 12/24/2012 9:35:21 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson