Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brent13a

Find faults in my argument. No sale with me on barbaric cultural practices, genital mutilation being the foremost example of its kind, both male and female. Imagine how these were performed just 120 years ago, when modern surgical practices were all but unknown - cutting with dirty knives, and sucking the blood by the mohel with his mouth - disgusting / abnormal rot!

Nature designed the penis with a protective, highly-innervated sheath for a purpose. Deal with it. It is unfair for a human being to have his sexual organs mutilated and diminished in qualitative function for a god, without his free will consent. There might even be some connection between sexually unsatisfied males (due to diminished pleasure from the amputation of the sensitive foreskin) and tendency to be polygamous / fornicative - quantity over quality, and all that.


34 posted on 12/08/2012 3:35:35 PM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

Bet you can’t wait to stoke those ovens.


35 posted on 12/08/2012 3:38:25 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett
Nature designed the penis with a protective, highly-innervated sheath for a purpose. Deal with it. It is unfair for a human being to have his sexual organs mutilated and diminished in qualitative function for a god, without his free will consent.

Life isn't fair. It is the parent's decision and is made with the best interests of the child in mind. Deal with that.

Anyone thinking the parent's should not be allowed to make that decision is an adolescent control freak. They care nothing for the child (since control freaks only care about themselves), but probably feel traumatized that it happened to them and want to exert some sort of infantile revenge that exposes their parents as evil monsters.
46 posted on 12/08/2012 4:49:05 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett
There might even be some connection between sexually unsatisfied males (due to diminished pleasure from the amputation of the sensitive foreskin) and tendency to be polygamous / fornicative - quantity over quality, and all that.

I understand it's been possibly linked to presbyopia also. /s.

Reduced pleasure? One could say that's a good thing. Imagine all the women complaining because their partner is finished when they are just getting started.

73 posted on 12/09/2012 5:19:18 AM PST by Vinnie (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson