Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosierham
I guess you don't believe in shooting to kill if someone enters your home unlawfully. I do. No one should have ANY right to live once they break into a home with the intent to rob and kill the homeowner. These hoodlums broke in other homes and the homeowner said there were 8 other prior break ins by teenagers that robbed his guns. If I were there I would have made certain they wouldn't have lived if they thought they were going to rob me blind.

Guessing there won't be too many more break ins at the guys house now that the teens know he isn't playing around.

151 posted on 12/09/2012 6:25:00 AM PST by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Highway

I believe you have the right to protect yourself but not to execute the intruder once disabled.Pretty sure that is also the intent of most American law.Executions are only to be done by the state after a fair trial.And yes I do realize criminals kill some of their victims every day.

If the homeowner or intended victim fires multiple shots at one time and kills the intruder that is one thing;but shooting the unarmed,disabled criminal lying on the floor is going too far.ONLY if the criminal is still struggling to reach a weapon does he or she still constitute a legitimate target.

Legally the threat made by anyone to kill someone else is not grounds for execution;even threatening the President is not an automatic death sentence.

YOU may feel that anyone uttering a death threat should be killed at the first chance but American law doesn’t agree with you.


160 posted on 12/09/2012 8:55:09 AM PST by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson