Posted on 11/16/2012 4:43:57 PM PST by VA Voter
The top 5 polls in order of accuracy.
IDB/TIPP
Google Consumer Surveys
Mellman
Rand Corporation
CNN
Me.
I got it right! No matter what the polls reported, I asssumed Obama would win due to voter fraud.
Sarah Palin in my opinion.
It was obvious that she was not enthusiastic about supporting Romney and it was also obvious that she knew he was the pick before the primaries had even began.
The GOPe will NEVER allow her to run as a Republican, so not sure where that leaves her.
Her SarahPac supported several winners so that’s where my money will go in the future.
Unlike the GOP that campaigned hard for Romney and are now throwing him under the bus, I have never seen her to that to anyone. She is loyal to a fault (maybe a little too loyal to McCain...lol).
She says what I feel and believe and that is important to me.
The problem started when Ann Coulter began supporting Mittens as the “most conservative” candidate in the GOP field...
You could see on Brit's face when Fox signed on he had seen the exit poll data and it did not look good.
I turned Rush off today. IMO, he’s losing his edge.
The ones who predicted the massive voter fraud and those who sat out the GOP primary in disgust.
A number of prominent people have egg on their face due to their predictions regarding this recent race; i.e. Rush, Rove, Morris, Hannity, etc.
We all predicted it until the first debate gave many of us unwarranted hope.
Rush didn’t reckon the level of voter fraud we had in this election. In fact, he doesn’t like to entertain conspiracy theories, such as rigged voting machines in the swing states. Just look at the run-around Allen West has been getting in Florida. - Rush has diagnosed the reason for Obama’s re-election . . uh, I mean ol’ Baracka Claus’s re-election. You can’t beat Santa Claus.
So you think the Dem +8 and more polls were right? Take another look. Zero didn’t win by 8 or more. Subtract the fraud and he doesn’t even win.
Exactly. many of them go it right except they didn’t factor in the massive fraud.
Because no one calculated the massive amount of fraud that took place.
(I do think the media knew in advance that this would be the most fraudulent election in US history.)
That debate was odd. Obama didn’t even try; looked absolutely “craven”. What was going on around that time? Of course, the affirmative action President has always had the skids greased for him; he was awfully cocky when he assured Medvedev he’d have more “flexibility” after he was re-elected. I feel like I live in Denmark; and there’s something rotten in it.
I put the Margin of Fraud at 2-3%.
I might have low-balled that a bit.
Remember Rove skimmed the donations for his own benefit.... and that little toe-sucker Morris has a book-a-week to feather his nest..... A pox on both of them.
-PJ
It’s somebody else who gets it right every time. That’s because polls are nothing but hocus pocus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.