I promised to answer by tomorrow, but for now my fingers are getting tired.
I don't think I brought up gay marriage "Was it gay marriage that you said you didnt have a problem with?" My mentor in my industry is quite gay, it's something that doesn't resonate with me, but nor does 443 hertz, and that doesn't mean I resent my guitar. Gay marriage is a re-definition of a word, which is how the left attacks the constitution. So no, I'm not for it.
And anyway (grammar error!) that's a dangling participle (end of your quote.) Send me good thinking, good grammar - something cogent, and I will respond. Since I already promised to respond to your earlier thought by tomorrow, I will keep my word on that reguardless. (dangling in nature, technically OK.)
Thank you for your reply. I was interested in knowing what you were referring in the message when you originally sent it. But at this point it is really not necessary for you to make the effort to respond. Thank very much for the courtesy of your reply.
Thank you for your reply. I was interested in knowing what you were referring in the message when you originally sent it. But at this point it is really not necessary for you to make the effort to respond. Thank very much for the courtesy of your reply.