Posted on 11/09/2012 6:17:13 PM PST by This Just In
Do you believe that some of the election victories were won legally or by way of fraud? What are the reasons for your opinion?
And when that "real conservative" loses by fraud, what then?
This is an absurd comment. No cheating on this magnitude.
I even started a thread...
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/elections/resultsarchive/index.asp
I live in Kansas and I was very careful to touch the Romney square on the electronic voting unit I was at...it immediately jumped to Obama. I corrected it, but I wish I could have kept the “credit card” that had my voting information on it so I could find out what information was transferred. I remember reading that the “election result reporting services” were purchased by foreign sources....it gives one pause....
http://investmentwatchblog.com/foreign-company-buys-u-s-election-results-reporting-firm/
This isn’t true either - Romney did win NC.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2957759/posts?page=1
I heard that 10 Colorado counties had more votes than voters
Reluctantly I’m sayin’ “fraud”.
Let’s start with the fraud in the primary schedule, which absolutely benefited the anointed GOPe choice of Romney. Loads of open primaries in liberal areas - oh, look, they prefer the least conservative in the field.
Then let’s move on to the fraud by Romney in trying to fake out that he’s anything other than a NE liberal former governor.
And finally, how about the fraud of ‘This is the best path!’ and ‘Surely he’s better than Obama!’ or ‘A vote for anyone else is a vote for Obama!’
We had a lackluster liberal candidate up against a more entrenched liberal candidate. Did it really much matter? Did any of the liberal apparatus really fear being fired when Romney came into office? I don’t think so. So why risk blowing the entire sweet ride by committing massive amounts of fraud?
And that’s what we’re talking here - minor fraud, of course, is to be expected from the liberals - disable a vote tabulating machine in a conservative precinct, that delays the counting of those votes, and of course, you build a significant enough ‘lead’, you’ll have people conceding before the votes are finished being counted. Vote in more than one precinct, or more than one state? Again, to be expected.
But the biggest flaw here is we had Romney shoved down our throat as the anointed candidate. Who had pretty much nothing to entice conservatives to come out and vote in numbers. And what happened? Fewer voted in this election than in the one with McCain.
That really worked out. Hey! I got a great idea, lets run yet another liberal up against a liberal and see if the public buys the fiction that there’s some massive difference between the two.
Has anyone done an analysis of the 26 states that were supposedly using machines from a Soros-affiliated company in Spain?
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/elections/resultsarchive/index.asp
Check the unofficial official results county by county.
The magnitude is both documented and astounding!
I think you need to look past the first couple of pages. Whatever they mean by turnout, it does not seem to make their vote totals look too outrageous. I’d look elsewhere for an example of excessive turnout.
Some of it is extremely brazen, there.appeared to be no response to the problem with the machines when they were flipping votes earlier. It is as if they knew there would be no accountability, rub it in your face.
VA requires ID, and has since long before 9/11/01. Just not photo ID.
Nonetheless, I DO believe there was a good bit of fraud in the right places and that has made all the difference.
This doesn’t make sense. The total shows more than 100%. But when you look at the page that shows the votes by individual candidate, the total is well under 100%. The first precinct, 001 Lakewood, shows 4800 registered voters and only 3200 votes. Am I reading it wrong?
One of what, ten? I stand corrected but it still defies the odds. And it was a pervasive pattern; big cities report last, once they know how many votes are needed.
More votes than registered voters in many precincts in key swing states.
I don’t care how it happened. That will likely be the last time we have a close election. In 2016, the country will be 60/40 for Takers/Makers.
You think we are going to convince 11% of the population that they need to get off the gov-tit and go to vote republican?
I’m changing my life to compensate for this “New America”. It has now been “Fundamentally Changed.”
It certainly looks like there was fraud..brazen fraud. If enough Republicans believe there was widespread fraud..then why take the time and trouble to vote next time, if the outcome is fixed?
When a precinct has more votes than registered voters what do you think?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.