Posted on 11/02/2012 6:35:25 AM PDT by mrs9x
Leaners it is 48.4 for Romney, and 47.6 for Obama. So iti s a little misleading to say that it is 48-48.
We will have to see what happens when some of these favorable post-Sandy Obama days fall off the chart.
To: CatOwner
I don’t know what to say to people like you. You turn your back on historical turnout, you turn your back on the truth. Are you saying Kerry didn’t make Ohio “ground-zero”? Are you saying Romney isn’t making Ohio “ground-zero”? **shakes head** 8 posted on 10/27/2012 10:24:06 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NH = 285EV) |
Do you seriously believe the Undecideds grew back to 4%? I said it a couple of weeks ago when Scott moved his projection estimate that he would end up putting too much slack in his model. And it's come home to haunt him.
I think we need a few more Republican pollsters to VERIFY the national numbers.
I can’t trust RAS anymore, this guy is setting this up to support the media meme of the moment.
Split decision - Obama wins electoral college - Romney wins popular vote is what I hear from the big media.
I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Kerry made Ohio "ground zero" and lost the election. Are you saying that's what is going to happen with Romney?
IOW: We’ll see Tuesday.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit drinking.
Newest PPP national has Obama up 1, 49-48. Sample moved up to D+6 (was D+4). Romney up w/ indies AND crossover voters.
PPP is actually 48/48. Any idea how much Romney is winning Indy’s by? If it is really a D+6 it has to be double digits among Indy’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.