[arthurus]

If you want the next Democrat administration and Congress to throw all the Republicans in jail then go ahead, put the kenyan in prison for his crimes and your sense of righteousness. It will begin an unending and enormous tit for tat that will end any aspect of liberty and constitutionalism that yet remains because a ruling party must be just that, a ruling party and such do not relinquish power just because of some election. A ruling party will have to keep itself in power lest its members go to prison or get hung.

[going hot]

Wow

Where did that come from?

Any house or senate member, or member of the exec branch, that breaks the law, needs to be prosecuted, regardless of political party affiliation, any one.

We do not have a ruling party, we have representatives, damn it.

It has to start somewhere. This forgiving the previous a holes is bull. Do the crime, do the time.

Reps need to be afraid of we the people, not the other political party.

[Yosemitest]

Obama needs to be fined the maximum fine, stripped of any financial support for him, his wife and his children, sentenced to 5 years in prison at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, and THEN executed at a TRAITOR, on public television.
THAT is how you put EVIL ... FROM AMONG YOU.
Anyone that assist TREASONOUS Obama or supports him, is also guilty in "principal". As stated on page 2 of the article published January 25, 1861, Treason Against the United States :

"It is well known," says FOSTER, " that in the language of the law there are no accessories in high treason -- all are principals.
Every instance of incitement, aid, or protection, which in case of felony will render a man an accessory before or after the fact, in the case of high treason, whether it be treason at common law or by statute, will make him a principal in treason."

"The propriety of investing the National Government." says Mr. Justice STORY, in his Commentaries on the Constitution, "with authority to punish the crime of treason against the United States,
could never become a question with any persons who deemed the National Government worthy of creation or preservation.
If the power had not been expressly granted, it must have been implied, unless all the powers of the National Government might be put at defiance and prostrated with impunity.
Two motives probably concurred in introducing it as an express power.
One was, not to leave it open to implication
whether it was to be exclusively punished with death, according to the known rule of the common law, and with the barbarous accompaniments pointed out by it --
but to confide the punishment to the discretion of Congress.
The other was, to impose some limitation upon the nature and extent of the punishment,
so that it should not work corruption of blood or forfeiture beyond the life of the offender."

Treason has ever been deemed the highest crime which can be committed in civil society;
since its aim is an overthrow of the Government and a public resistance by force of its just powers,
its tendency is to create universal danger and alarm,
and on this account it has often been visited with the deepest public resentment.
Hence, by the common law, the the punishment of high treason was accompanied by all the refinements in cruelty which were oftentimes literally and studiously executed.
But under the Constitution of the United States the power of punishing the crime of treason against the United States is exclusive in Congress;
and the trial of the offence belongs exclusively to the Federal tribunals.
A State cannot take cognizance or punish the offence, whatever it may do in relation to the offence of treason committed exclusively against itself.

So anyone who assisted or supported Obama in his TREASON, is guilty, also, of TREASON Against the United States.
Anyone who has any time in the military has been well briefed on the legal headache of trying to figure out whether an order is a "LAWFUL ORDER" or not,
and the rock and the hard spot you're between when you follow an UNLAWFUL ORDER, or FAIL to follow a LAWFUL ORDER.