Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

It is up to us to determine why the Obama Administration has chosen to Cover Up what happened.

What are they trying in vain to hide?

The longer Secretary of Statements Hilly takes to “get to the bottom of this,” the more obvious it is that the Benghazi Cover Up was hastily designed to hide a VERY BIG US SECRET TOPIC.

My guess is that the CIA had discovered that some of the 20,000 Libyan Missiles were found in the possession of Ansar al-Sharia, or al-Qaeda who were then shipping them to Syria, and Obama knew all about it.

Can Hilly and Billy keep this a secret until after November 6, 2012?

Their lives just might depend on it - - - .

Meanwhile, Obama and Biden have lied to the American People, as well as their key officials have repeatedly lied to us.

The White House Benghazi Cover Up had closed ranks behind their Commander In Chief.

Could Obama have survived the November Election with the embarrassment of a resurgent al-Qaeda in Libya?

Possibly, IF he would have told the truth at his first public announcement, and rallied Americans to “not change horses in the middle of the stream,” etc. etc., etc.

No way in Hell, once Obama lied.


2 posted on 10/26/2012 12:20:26 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Graewoulf

The gun running operation is quite public on the internet though Hillary and Panetta try to avoid talking about it - it’s always been a very poorly kept secret.

After all, the U.S. admitted helping the Libyan rebels.

Nothing to hide there.

The failure to order the rescue is the dereliction of duty that is exposed on the internet but avoided by the snews media.

There’s just no reason to “wait and see”, an administration that did it’s duty would initiate efforts to save the staff. Every time, there’s no valid excuse.

Determining their motivation for such a gross dereliction of duty is what will lead to finding out about the serious wrongdoing, whatever that is.

The refusal to bring security to standard recommended levels all year is a telltale sign to me.

The Congressional testimony showed the professional security officers utterly baffled as to the denial of their requests.

Their testimony, IMHO, shows that they did not know the real plot.


6 posted on 10/26/2012 12:33:26 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson