The man is also a victim, unless you have substantive evidence he is guilty a crime.
How are you coming on that?
“The man is also a victim, unless you have substantive evidence he is guilty a crime.
How are you coming on that?”
Yes, I lined that out. I gave three possible scenarios. In the first, he’s an innocent guy when hyper police break in and shoot his dogs in cold blood. In that case, he’s a victim.
Scenario 2 and 3, no, he’s not a victim. Only the dogs are.
You don’t like that I’m working on the assumption that the man really is a pot grower. Yet you are working on the assumption that the cops really shot his dogs for no good reason. That is not for certain either, you know.
I bet the guy arguing with you and me loves it when he has to be treated like a criminal being searched by our beloved TSA gropers/glorified baggage checkers.