If you have a shred of evidence that pot was at the residence, provide it.
“If you have a shred of evidence that pot was at the residence, provide it.”
I am getting a little tired of repeating the fact that the only way we have reason to think there was a real pot growing crime going on is because of the “bust” in the title. I have said repeatedly, as we all I think acknowledge, that the article is terribly written.
My position remains that a responsible dog owner should not endanger his dog unnecessarily. One might argue that a guide dog for the blind or a sheep dog guarding sheep from wolves at night are endangered, but, the idea is that it is worth the risk. Pot growing operations, in my opinion, are not. I don’t think he should have endangered his animals by having them hang around an illegal drug operation. Maybe you think that is responsible dog ownership. I don’t.