The love of most grew cold when the Supreme Court approved baby murder. This has to be a factor in the national subconcious of two generations of young people. The law of the land said that murder for convenience was an acceptable thing, how can they have a sense of moral bounderies?
Very much agreed; they will never overturn Roe v. Wade for the simple fact that as long as it stands the Supreme Court can point to it as precedent *spit* that they can not only invalidate the duly passed laws of the states [making the 10th Amendment of no effect] but craft new law out of whole cloth.
Furthermore, when the "mother's health" is cited as an acceptable exception to "abortion is wrong" what is invariably meant is that it is ok if the mother is merely inconvenienced.
This has to be a factor in the national subconcious of two generations of young people.
Thus we have the rape exception to "abortion ought to be considered murder" -- why would you condemn someone to death who has absolutely nothing to do with the act by which they were conceived? It is not only murder, but murder of the provably innocent considered, for the wrongdoings of their parent!? Utterly sickening.