There can be no answer?? Sean Carroll is no longer a scientist, then, but a witch doctor. Nor are any of those that are attempting to explain creation without a Creator, because they are asking us to have faith in their unobservable theories (i.e. fraud). We cannot observe a parallel universe. Nothing in the universe suggests any contractiononly expansion. Suggesting physical and chemical laws without a lawgiver is the ultimate fraud. Oppositions of science falsely so-called indeed.
1 posted on
10/01/2012 11:16:17 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: Olog-hai
128 posted on
10/03/2012 2:23:03 PM PDT by
ColdSteelTalon
(Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
To: Olog-hai
Over the past few centuries, science can be said to have gradually chipped away at the traditional grounds for believing in God. Much of what once seemed mysteriousthe existence of humanity, the life-bearing perfection of Earth, the workings of the universecan now be explained by biology, astronomy, physics and other domains of science.
Although cosmic mysteries remain, Sean Carroll, a theoretical cosmologist at the California Institute of Technology, says there's good reason to think science will ultimately arrive at a complete understanding of the universe that leaves no grounds for God whatsoever.
It sounds like something of the intellectual depth characteristic of Yahoo News/LiveScience.com.
135 posted on
10/03/2012 3:24:57 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: Olog-hai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson