That's from the Natural History Museum in Prague.
The Neanderthal was the absolute apex predator of ice-age Europe and had spread out to other regions as well, particularly the Levant. He walked on two feet, made stone implements and weapons including thrusting spears, scrapers, and knives, and was certainly more intelligent than any other creature in his environment prior to the arrival of modern humans although it's been noted that some of his physiology and behavior resembled that of big cats more than that of humans:
http://thesubversivearchaeologist.blogspot.com/2011_11_20_archive.html
So, I thought I'd do a wee comparison between a modern day "top" carnivore and our cousin's, the Neanderthal, face. Do you see what I see in the image below? It looks as if the felid and the Neanderthal face have more in common than either has with the modern human.The lion has a keen sense of smell. Which of the bipedal cousins do you think has the better sense of smell? Relative to the rest of the face, the big cat has a nasal aperture that's equivalent in size to that of the Neanderthal. Not so that of the modern-day hominid on the right.
A cat can spot its prey from 3 km away. Can you? Do you think the Neanderthal could?
The cat has dagger-like fangs and molar teeth that would put a deli meat-slicer to shame. "Aha!" you might say, "that chap from Forbes quarry couldn't be as effective as the lion--it doesn't have the appropriate dental accoutrements!" Umm. It's possible, isn't it, that all those flint flakes lying about came in handy for more than whittling?
Gargett also notes that if you try to draw a human-like Neanderthal with the eyes and nose as large as the bones indicate they would have to be, what you end up with is outlandish:
Given all of that, people were starting to wonder if in fact Neanderthals might have had fur coats and the astonishing answer to all such questions has arrived in the form of a massive study by a New Zealand scholar by the name of Danny Vendramini and may be viewed at a website (www.themandus.org) and a youtube video.
What Vendramini noticed early on is something which scholars should have figured out a hundred years ago i.e. that Neanderthal skulls, other than for much larger brain area, are a very good match for primate profiles and a very bad match for ours:
Vendramini's reconstructions take all of that into account as well as the much larger (than ours) eye sockets and nasal areas and, again, the results are startling (Some images without the 6" ice-age fur coat for illustration purposes): 
The most startling thing about the creature is the eyes. Dinosaurs had eyes like that as do several very old kinds of animals, lemurs, tarsiers, bush babies and possibly one or two others. Vendramini assumes the eyes were adapted for nocturnal hunting but we have nocturnal creatures in our present world which don't have anything like those kinds of eyes and my own guess is that those eyes were adapted to a world which never experienced anything which we'd call daylight at all.
In sharp contrast to all of that, Cro Magnon artwork shows the earliest humans on the planet to look entirely like us:
Judge for yourself whether you think there'd be any possibility of humans and Neanderthals "interbreeding(TM)".....
Judge for yourself also which of the two creatures (Neanderthal or human) would be better fit for taking on mammoths and wooly rhinos with thrusting spears.....