Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: albionin
Yes, speculation is all that it is and it has no basis in fact. All of the story of Genesis is that way. There is zero evidence that any of it took place and if it is taken literally then the evidence is against it being true.

There is evidence that the events of Genesis took place but only if one believes the words of Jesus Christ in scripture. When answering a question about divorce, Christ gave this answer:

Mat 19:4 And He answered and said to them, "Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning 'MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,'
Mat 19:5 and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH' ?

So Christ himself, whom scripture teaches IS God, affirms that the creation account is valid. Or at least he never disavowed them. Other biblical figures affirm the creation account as true and accurate.

The speculative part is the "why" of certain things. They're speculative because scripture is silent on some matters.

As a believer, I think that the proper approach is to assume that these things are true and figure out where and how the physical and historical evidence fit into this truth.

57 posted on 09/23/2012 5:53:22 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: DouglasKC

The bible can not be considered evidence in logic any more than the book of Mormon or the Koran. You can say you believe it but that does not make it true. Science deals with objective measurable facts of existence. The base of knowledge of reason is existence. The base of knowledge of faith is belief without reason. The substance of that which is hoped for is a wish. Wishes are not absolutes. Feelings are not absolutes. Numbers of believers are not a substitute for evidence any more than the number of believers of a scientific theory if there is no evidence to support it. Existence is an absolute, facts are absolutes. Feelings are not. Arbitrary claims are not means of cognition.


65 posted on 09/23/2012 7:32:07 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson