well geeee. thats amazing..wonder who wrote it.
CNN probably told the terrorists where he was so they could get some good ‘news’.
This legal? Interfering with evidence? Crime scene.
On Wednesday, CNN talk show host Anderson Cooper told Sen. John McCain on “Anderson Cooper 360,” that “a source familiar with Ambassador Stevens’s thinking told us that in the months before his death he talked about being worried about the never-ending security threats that he was facing in Benghazi and specifically about the rise in Islamic extremism and growing al Qaeda presence.” The source, Cooper said, “also mentioned (Stevens) being on an al Qaeda hit list.”
One would THINK that this FURTHER discredits the Obama Administration as well as that creature who runs its state department.
CNN’s amoral and criminal interference with an investigation cannot be brushed off. “Largely unguarded” means they snuck past the guards and took evidence, then used the diary to sell advertising. RIP ethics.
CNN: Reliably mouthing the words of terror networks.
Anybody recall that CNN actually paid Saddam Hussein to stay in Iraq and let him pre-screen and censor their reports? True facts seemingly lost in the turbulent world of objective reporting, I guess.
I read that the terrorists took classified information regarding allies/safe houses/etc. from the place where Stevens was murdered.... CNN probably got the journal from the terrorists.
I thought Hilldebeast said he was never worried.
Someone needs to ask why they were talking to State after admitting to being in possession of evidence in what is widely known to be an FBI investigation? Independent of how they came into possession of the journal (which could also be illegal), they should have been talking to the DoJ, no? The answer is either A) Yes, we made a mistake and we have opened a separate investigation into CNN’s actions, or B) the FBI has no jurisdiction and we are handing over the investigation to the DoD. WTF?!
Probably given to them by the state department.
CNN-GATE !!