Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: George189

I have no doubt that his police friends were more than happy to get him to collect constitutionally protected information on their behalf.

That is the attitude which disturbs me—the notion that one believes it acceptable to decimate constitutionally protected information to the police simply because one is also a government employee.

Apologies for not making that clearer.


107 posted on 09/22/2012 9:17:23 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Altariel

Except the information is not constitutionally protected.

His claim was that you need an “administrative warrant” to verify addresses on the internet, and that police went to him/her because they couldn’t do it otherwise.

His claim is categorically false.


108 posted on 09/22/2012 9:31:28 PM PDT by George189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson