[SuzyQueIN]

Whoa.

“During the proceeding, Nagamine argued that Duncan Sunahara’s request did not derive from a true interest to examine or obtain a copy of his sister’s original birth records, to which he was entitled under Hawaii law. Nagamine insisted his underlying interest was to produce evidence in Obama’s birth controversy, to which he was not entitled under Hawaii law.”

If Virginia’s birth record isn’t linked to Obama’s, then how could Duncan’s request be an attempt to “produce evidence in Obama’s birth controversy”?

Hasn’t Nagamine basically just admitted that Obama’s BC number was stolen from Virginia Sunahara’s BC?

[Mr. K]

that is a darn good point

[Mr. K]

"Nagamine argued that Duncan Sunahara’s request did not derive from a true interest to examine or obtain a copy of his sister’s original birth records, to which he was entitled under Hawaii law."The law says he is entitled to it, whatever his intentions are.

[Smokeyblue]

"During the proceeding, Nagamine argued that Duncan Sunahara’s request did not derive from a true interest to examine or obtain a copy of his sister’s original birth records, to which he was entitled under Hawaii law. Nagamine insisted his underlying interest was to produce evidence in Obama’s birth controversy, to which he was not entitled under Hawaii law."

Good catch.