As I wrote before....some are true quotes and make perfect sense, while others are just plainly false. As an example...
“Under which you realize esoteric understanding independent of the Scripture, and then the Bible can mean whatever you think it means in confirming what you already concluded,”
That does not sound like you Roy at all because he certainly knows that there is an objective truth and the entire idea of the Be Still is to come out of lala land, out of thoughts and fantasies so that the Holy spirit can truly lead us. And just because the exact exercise is not in the bible does not make it good. This is very much what some of the quote dealt with that you cannot come to terms with, that it is not the written word that is the really important thing, but rather the holy spirit that is the director of those words. You are like totally extremely and word fixated so you cannot really grow spiritually. And you are very rote/ rigid which makes you dry and dull.
THAT “for instance,” was never specified by you, and is not a referenced quote, which normally have numbers after them per the standard practice, but it was included just after the quote with its number due to some piece of html code unintentionally being in there (and my hastily not previewing it)
And which you and i perpetuated in reposting, as was another comment, while after that which supplied some clarification by me, (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2931985/posts?page=579#538) you broadly stated that “those, [plural] are not Roy’s quotes.” (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2931985/posts?page=545#545) However, thus i showed that the number-referenced quotes are indeed from Masters, and that my comment is accurate.
And the next quote you reject as being from Roy is also from him, which my next post will address and document.