To: barmag25
Lets analyze why this is a good looking car:
- Small a-pillars
- Coupe with big doors
- Low beltline
- Decent amount of glass, not to much
- Rear deck and front deck about the same size, balance
- Rear wheel drive
- Coke bottle hips
Detroit it isn't that hard to figure out, just dust off the old blue prints and start upgrading technoogy...
15 posted on
09/09/2012 9:42:39 AM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
Detroit it isn't that hard to figure out, just dust off the old blue prints and start upgrading technoogy...
I like how the Brazilians kept the Ford Galaxie line running up into the early 1980's, same we let the Galaxie die early here.
130 posted on
09/09/2012 1:26:30 PM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: central_va
8. NO ‘B’ Pillar.
If the new Camaro and Challenger didn't have the stupid “B” Pillar, with the dinky side rear window, they would look awesome, or pretty good anyway. LOL
If you look back at the 60 era Muscle Car Coupes, including the Impala / Caprice, having that uninterrupted open window space made the look of the car. My Buddy's Father had a Black 67 Impala 396 SS that I loved as much as my 69 Chevelle. It would be one of my Lotto Cars for sure.
The Feds mandate Roof Strength and people can still by Convertibles. Makes sense to me
163 posted on
09/09/2012 5:15:36 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(Republicans Hope people are Smart, but Democrats Know people are Stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson