I didn’t see anyone supporting it-the gist of discussion/debate was about how to keep it from being accepted on an equal footing with heterosexual marriage, and that is where the different opinions came in-get rid of civil marriage licenses, restrict them, make them different, get churches involved, etc. I was debating the method, not the substance (which I agree wholeheartedly with).
How does getting homosexual churches and polygamous Islamic churches, and cults of every flavor, defining marriage, help keep the definition of marriage as one man, one woman?