[papertyger]

While millions of CCW holders carry weapons with more than 10 rounds, meaning they “HAVE”, there is no record that I’m aware of that demonstrate their USE.

All I did was post the reasoning for my CCW choice, and you chose to shine a spotlight on it, by condemning it as bait for the gun-grabbers.

If a civilian needs more than 9 rounds, it’s because he went looking for trouble.

You might want to just walk away from this one. Your cognitive dissonance (no doubt due to embarrassment) is really kicking in.

[G Larry]

You might want to enroll in a couple semesters of logic.

You seem to be criticizing my assessment of other people’s “needs”.

A “need” is validated by demonstrating a consequence resulting from lack of access to supply.

The subject here is civilian self-defense, not a tyrannical take-over.
The unit of measure is not “want”.

If there were “need”, there would be evidence of a consequence due to lack of supply.

You have provided NONE.

Repeating my posts back to me and suggesting I might be embarrassed, is NOT exactly a thoughtful evaluation and rebuttal of my position.
You posts certainly have brought no objective facts to the discussion.