[albionin]

You would be if the flame behaved exactly in every way like a photon. If the flame doesn’t then what is the basis for the comparison?

You keep evading the question? You are proposing that the laws of physics governing photons are not absolutes. the Onus is on you to prove it and not on others to prove a negative. This is simple logic.

You will question everything except the story of the creation. Do you mean that the laws of physics are mutable but the arbitrary claims of genesis are not?

[EternalVigilance]

You are proposing that the laws of physics governing photons are not absolutes.

I've done no such thing. I've simply pointed out the obvious fact that you cannot prove they have always stayed exactly the same via observation. You haven't been around since the beginning.

[EternalVigilance]

Enough fun for one night. Time to hit the sack.

Thanks for the interesting conversation.

Good night.